R. Berankis
To Win
B. Paire
To Win
Ricardas Berankis vs Jerzy Janowicz Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W W W W L
Form
L W L W W L W W L LHead-To-Head: Berankis 1 - 2 Janowicz
They have played 8 sets in total, with Berankis winning 3 and Janowicz winning 5. The last match between Berankis and Janowicz was at the Mons Challenger, 05-10-2016, Second, I.hard with Ricardas Berankis getting the victory 7-5 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ricardas Berankis | 1 |
| Jerzy Janowicz | 2 |
Mons Challenger(05-10-2016)
7
5
7
6
| Berankis | Stats | Janowicz |
|---|---|---|
| 70% (14-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 294 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 50 | Highest Rank | 14 |
| 34 | Age | 34 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 16 | Titles | 13 |
| 60% (603-403) | Career Total W/L | 61% (370-238) |
| $2,395,158 | Career Prize Money | $1,877,845 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 2 |
Upcoming Match
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Agut VS Clar PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Jerzy Janowicz
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
9
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Jerzy Janowicz
Player
Ricardas Berankis
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
17
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
22%
(
17 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 7-6(5) | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 38 | Games Won | 46 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 26 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 0:36:58 | Average Match Time | 0:36:58 |
| 66% (122/184) | 1st Serve % | 73% (122/167) |
| 70% (86/122) | 1st Serve Win % | 78% (95/122) |
| 45% (28/62) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (18/45) |
| 16% (3/19) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 27% (6/22) |
| 32% (54/167) | Return Points Win % | 38% (70/184) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ricardas Berankis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Maximus Jones
Player
Ricardas Berankis
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
11
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
24 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Tibo Colson
56%
(
59 of
105)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
109)
2
Aces
25
1
Double Faults
7
83%
(
49 of
59)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
55 of
65)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
31 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
38 of
109)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(4) 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Michael Geerts
62%
(
64 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
12
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Aleksandre Bakshi
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
11
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
95%
(
36 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
13 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Aryan Shah
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
86)
11
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Ricardas Berankis
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Ricardas Berankis
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Ricardas Berankis
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Jie Cui
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jerzy Janowicz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Jerzy Janowicz
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Jerzy Janowicz
81%
(
66 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerzy Janowicz
Player
Carlos Taberner
69%
(
68 of
99)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
7
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
49 of
61)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
103
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerzy Janowicz
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Jerzy Janowicz
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerzy Janowicz
Player
Ryan Peniston
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerzy Janowicz
Player
Sebastian Ofner
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
9
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Jerzy Janowicz
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
111)
14
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerzy Janowicz
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
15
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Jerzy Janowicz
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
53%
(
44 of
83)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
36%
(
37 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
83)
94
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (603/403) | Win/Loss | 61% (370/238) |
| 57% (1398/1047) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (892/647) |
| 52% (12377/11278) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8050/7371) |
| 59% (266/185) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (46/47) |
| 52% (71/66) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (140/92) |
| 65% (235/125) | Indoor Hard W/L | 65% (161/86) |
| 53% (31/27) | Grass Win/Loss | 64% (23/13) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.47 |
| 3449 | Aces Total | 3518 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 2400 | Total Double Faults | 1628 |
| 1:13:48 | Average Match Time | 1:1:26 |
| 505.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 571.74 |
| 58% (34171/59057) | 1st Serve % | 62% (19379/31120) |
| 72% (24492/34171) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (14659/19379) |
| 53% (13099/24880) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5976/11733) |
| 40% (2228/5574) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (944/2526) |
| 38% (22786/59726) | Return Points Win % | 35% (11150/31652) |
| 51% (50/48) | Slam W/L | 57% (34/26) |
| 40% (19/29) | Masters W/L | 46% (24/28) |
| 82% (31/7) | Cups W/L | 67% (24/12) |
| 53% (140/124) | Main Tour W/L | 54% (62/53) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 65% (323/171) | Challenger W/L | 61% (140/88) |
| 63% (40/23) | Futures W/L | 74% (86/30) |
| 61% (557/914) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (329/533) |
| 49% (41/84) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 56% (40/72) |
| 54% (197/367) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (166/315) |
| 57% (186/327) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (124/218) |
| 87% (577/503) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (360/307) |
| 13% (577/74) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (360/52) |
| 23% (427/100) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (248/63) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
